Re-Turn deposit: making polluters pay, or rewarding them?


THE LAST WORD

By Pat Coughlan

The Re-Turn deposit return scheme has been making waves in Ireland, aiming to tackle the ever-growing issue of waste. The idea is simple: you pay a small deposit when you buy a drink, and you get it back when you return the empty container. Sounds straightforward, right? But as I’ve been looking into it, I can’t help but wonder if it’s really making the polluters pay or just giving them a pat on the back. Let’s dive in and see what this scheme is all about and what it hopes to achieve.

Who funds the ReTurn service in Ireland

So, you’ve probably wondered, just like I did, where the cash comes from to run the ReTurn service in Ireland. It’s a fair question, especially when we’re all picking up bottles and cans and feeling good about saving the planet. While it’s easy to think the Government’s footing the bill — partially true —there’s more to it.

The Government does throw in some euros, mostly to get the ball rolling and to promote the service. But here’s the kicker: businesses are also chipping in. Companies that produce all those drink containers we’re busy returning are paying fees. It’s like they’re being nudged to up their game in sustainability. Yet, cynically, you could say they’re just passing those costs on to us consumers through price hikes. So, while it might look like it’s the companies doing their bit, in the end, it’s you and I who might end up paying more for our favourite drinks.

I’ve got to admit, the Re-Turn scheme leaves me feeling a bit torn. On one hand, it’s great to see an initiative that encourages people to recycle. But on the other, I can’t shake off the feeling that it’s letting the real culprits off the hook. Are we really holding polluters accountable, or are we just giving them a free pass to keep doing what they’re doing? It’s a bit of a head-scratcher, and I find myself grappling with these mixed emotions every time I think about it.

I can’t help but wonder if the Re-Turn scheme is really hitting the polluters where it hurts. Are companies just finding clever ways to dodge responsibility? It seems like they might be using the scheme as a get-out-of-jail-free card. By participating, are they genuinely making amends, or just ticking a box? I’m sceptical about the penalties in place — are they tough enough to make a real difference, or just a token gesture?

It’s more about getting us to recycle rather than cutting down on waste in the first place. Sure, it’s great to see people returning bottles and cans, but are we really tackling the root of the problem? It seems like we’re just putting a plaster on a bigger issue. Shouldn’t we be focusing on reducing the amount of waste we produce altogether?

It’s hard to tell if businesses are truly committed to sustainable change or just looking for an easy way out. And is the Re-Turn scheme is really built to last. Is it genuinely fostering sustainable changes, or are we just scratching the surface? I’ve got my doubts. It feels like we might need more robust measures to make a real impact. The broader implications for the environment and society are huge, and I’m not convinced this scheme is the silver bullet we need.

I reckon we need a more robust approach that tackles waste at its source. Maybe it’s time to rethink our strategies and hold the big players accountable in a more meaningful way.

Previous ILLUSTRATED TALK ON STAINED GLASS WINDOWS
Next Community bonds strengthened as Butts Young Leaders host chill and grill